Factory Farming for the Future Essays

Factory Farming for the Future Essays Factory Farming for the Future Essay Factory Farming for the Future Essay Moon Baby Amy Chaos Critical Thinking: Farming for the Future The United States government should subsidize the feed of animals on Concentrated Animal Feeding Operations (Cafes), because this method of producing food is efficient, cost-effective, and in terms of economics, is favorable overall compared to the traditional idea of a farm. A modern practice implemented since the sasss, factory farming has revolutionized the meat industry, producing mass amounts of cheap meat with less land space than is needed for more primitive forms of raising domestic livestock for food. Commonly recognized for its industrial approach to reducing meat, the use of Cafes accounts for the 9. 5 billion food animals slaughtered in the United States every year (Cutouts 3). The mass production of such large quantities of meat allow peoples of all economic classes the opportunity to consume animal products and is practical in this day and age. Cafes have become a global phenomenon in the past decades and is on the rise, especially in the United States because of government subsidizing. : The United States Department of Agriculture (USDA) supplies commodity based agriculture subsidies based on units of output (Earth. Org). This product based reward system encourages competitiveness between companies and a standard of agricultural production that is above an efficient level, thus resulting in cheaper goods (Earth. Org). The U. S. Government should continue to subsidize Cafes as it currently does, spending $16 million between 1996 and 2002 (Earth. Org). Another cost effective aspect of factory farming is vertical integration, a process utilized by most large-scale companies which mean they control all aspects of production, including animal rearing, feeding, slaughtering, packaging and distribution (Farrell) because it gives the farmer or many more control over costs and creates a more desirable input to output ratio. In addition, factory farming is necessary in mitigating some of the most prominent issues in America, poverty and malnutrition. While critics of Cafes insist that they impact the environment negatively and treat animals unethically, the truth of the matter is that nearly 12 million kids in the U. S. Do not have guaranteed meals or food sources due to financial difficulties (sidecars. Org). Producing nearly 99% of all animals farmed and slaughtered in America (cows, pigs, chickens, and fish), factory farms can souse more than 125,000 animals under one roof (forwarded. Org) and provide a significant amount of sustenance for millions of people. Lastly, in this day and age, farmers are getting increasingly lower wages for the amount of goods they produce. Small family farms have been replaced with large corporations since WI, decreasing by 39% between 1969 and 2002 (Earth. Org). Many factors have influenced this change including a decreased interest in farming, urban population growth, and increased efficiency of farms (e factory farming). The only way for modern day farmers to catch up with this rapidly evolving industry, Cafes need to be implemented. A prime example is Jim Hamilton, a farmer in Wyoming, who reported that in 1979 he charged $1. 10 per pound of beef but in 2002 only received $0. 86. Lower prices for agricultural products impact a farmers life tremendously not to past. Cafes are necessary for the problems and needs of today and should continue to be a priority for the U. S. Government to sustain and subsidize. The elimination of poverty, malnutrition, and the quality of life for many American farmers depend on the institution of factory farming as it is efficient and maximizes profit through mass production.

The Present Participle in English

The Present Participle in English A present participle is a  verb form  (or verbal)- made by adding -ing to the base- that often functions as an adjective. Present participles are the only verb forms that are completely regular. The present participle (also known as the -ing form) is used with a form of the auxiliary be to express the progressive aspect. For a discussion of the differences between present participles and gerunds (both of which end in -ing), see gerunds. Examples and Observations The hotel were staying in is super deluxe, and we have a working television set.(Cristina Garcia, I Wanna Be Your Shoebox. Simon Schuster, 2008)The Mole had been working very hard all the morning.(Kenneth Grahame, The Wind in the Willows, 1908Working in shifts, we get the grave dug by early afternoon and return to the bunkhouse.(Guy Vanderhaeghe, The Englishmans Boy. McClelland Stewart., 1996Im looking for something in an attack dog. One who likes the sweet gamey tang of human flesh.(Mr. Burns in The Simpsons, 1992Looking back you realize that a very special person passed briefly through your lifeand that person was you. It is not too late to find that person again.(attributed to Robert Brault)And standing on the sidelines during those first games were the veterans, holding the spaldeens, bouncing them, smelling them in an almost sacramental way.(Pete Hamill, A Drinking Life, 1994When suffering comes, we yearn for some sign from God, forgetting we have just had one.(Mignon McLaughl in, The Complete Neurotics Notebook. Castle Books, 1981 I drive through the electric gates of a three-acre estate, passing landscaped gardens before I pull up in front of a neocolonial mansion, parking beside a Bentley, two Porsches and a Lamborghini Spyder. Moonsamy, wearing jeans and a T-shirt, is waiting for me at the door.(Joshua Hammer, Inside Cape Town. Smithsonian, April 2008Their hair in curlers and their heads wrapped in loud scarves, young mothers, fattish in trousers, lounge about in the speed-wash, smoking cigarettes, eating candy, drinking pop, thumbing magazines, and screaming at their children above the whir and rumble of the machines.(William Gass, In the Heart of the Heart of the CountryAlthough we have traditionally thought of the participle as an adjectival (and that is certainly its more common role), some participles and participial phrases clearly have an adverbial function, providing information of time, place, reason, and manner, as other adverbials do.(Martha Kolln and Robert Funk, Understanding English Grammar. A llyn and Bacon, 1998 Walking through Sherwood Forest at sunset, we could feel an air of mystery, as if the ancient trees had a story to tell, if only we could hear.(Winsoar Churchill, Robin Hoods Merry England. British Heritage, April 1998Standing near the door, we dipped our fingers in the holy water, crossed and blessed ourselves, and proceeded up to the sleeping-room, in the usual order, two by two.(Maria Monk . . . StandingIn the shoes of indecision, I hear themCome up behind me and go on ahead of meWearing boots, on crutches, barefoot, they could neverGet together on any door-sill or destination- (W.S. Merwin, Sire. The Second Four Books of Poems. Copper Canyon Press, 1993 Whats the Difference Between a Gerund and a Present Participle? Both of these -ing forms are verbals. A gerund functions as a noun:  Laughing is good for you.  A present participle functions as an adjective: The old laughing lady dropped by to call Usage Advice: Not Simultaneous Not Simultaneous. The misuse of the present participle is a common structural sentence-fault for beginning writers. Putting his key in the door, he leapt up the stairs and got his revolver out of the bureau. Alas, our hero couldnt do this even if his arms were forty-feet long. This fault shades into Ing Disease, the tendency to pepper sentences with words ending in -ing, a grammatical construction which tends to confuse the proper sequence of events. (Attr. Damon Knight) (Bruce Sterling, A Workshop Lexicon. Paragons: Twelve Master Science Fiction Writers Ply Their Crafts, ed. by Robin Wilson. St. Martins Press, 1997 Time and the Present Participle The problem of teaching the participle is certainly not simplified by the fact that this term is obviously a misnomer. The student, accustomed to present tenses which indicate present time, and past tenses which indicate past time, cannot comprehend the sophistry of a present participle which indicates now present, now past, now future time. . . . Why insist on calling the participle in -ing present no matter what time it happens to be indicating? (Karl G. Pfeiffer, The Present Participle- A Misnomer. The English Journal, 1931) Also Known As: active, imperfect, or -ing participle